A Rebuttal to E. R. Dodds On Misunderstanding the...

A Rebuttal to E. R. Dodds On Misunderstanding the Oedipus Rex In On Misunderstanding the Oedipus Rex, E. R. Dodds takes issue with three different opinions on Oedipus Rex. I consider the first two opinions, which Dodds gleaned from student papers, to be defensible from a close reading of the text. The first of these opinions is that Oedipus was a bad man, and was therefore punished by the gods; Dodds counters that Sophocles intended for us to regard him as good, noble, and selfless. But the play would seem to indicate that Oedipus, while a clever man, is not a good one -- this can be shown through Dodds own source of argument, the attitude of the chorus, as well as through Oedipus own actions onstage. Oedipus does not, as Dodds†¦show more content†¦However, the driving force of Oedipus fact-finding mission is an attempt to end the plague which racks his city. He does not realize the personal consequences his hunt will have for him, and his loyalty to the truth (23) is based on his ignorance of it. In fact, if we examine the events lead ing up to Oedipus revelation, the incidental nature of his quest for identity becomes apparent. First, he summons Tiresias to name the killer, whom Oedipus does not at the time believe to be himself. Then a messenger arrives from Corinth, unbidden by the king, revealing that Oedipus is not truly Polybus son. Finally, the shepherd reveals all of Oedipus past, after having been called for the purpose of providing more information about Laius death. The coincidental nature of these events is somewhat at odds with Dodds vision of Oedipus as a sort of Greek private detective who relentlessly ferrets out clues in a self-destructive search for his parents. Oedipus is eager to find the truth, but the most pivotal witnesses for the true story of his birth either come to him of their own volition, or are convened by Oedipus in the hopes that they will tell him something entirely different. In the end, he resigns himself to the truth which would have been clear much earlier (as it was to Jocas ta), had he

Commission in the European Union Free Essays

As a staff member of the Directorate-General of the European Commission I have been appointed to describe to you the composition and the powers of the Commission in the European Union. In the following paragraph I will describe the body of the Commission divided in three pillars: First you have the College of the Commissioners, then the Directorate-General (DGs) and lastly the cabinets. In the Third paragraph I will briefly describe the powers of the Commission and in the last paragraph I will conclude with an opinion on the question, as to how far I consider the European Commission to have â€Å"a vocation to further the interests of the community as a whole†. We will write a custom essay sample on Commission in the European Union or any similar topic only for you Order Now The Commission consists of twenty-seven Commissioners, one for each Member State including the President of the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security. The Commissioners are responsible for the work of the commission stated in Art. 17 of the TEU, and are therefore not allowed to have any other duties during their period of office that could bring about any conflict of interest. If a Commissioner fails to do so, the Court of Justice may retire the member concerned on application of the Commission or the Council acting on a simple majority. The exception to this rule is, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy who is a member of the Commission responsible for the conduct of the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy and its security and defense policy but also takes part in the work of the EC, presides over the Foreign affairs Council and carries out mandates of the Council. The High representative is appointed by QMV with agreement of the President of the Commission, and may be dismissed the same way. The president of the Commission is proposed to the European Parliament by the European Council acting by a qualified majority, and is elected in the European Parliament. The president is the most powerful Commissioner and has several important roles: he/she adopts the list of the persons whom it proposes to appoint as members of the Commission, lays the guidelines in which the Commission is to work, decides the internal organization of the commission making sure it works as a body, appoints the Vice-Presidents from among the members of the Commission (other than the High Representative), he can resign Commissioners since they are individually responsible to him. Finally the President has an important role as representative. He represents the Commission at meetings involving the heads of Government and must account to other institutions when there is questioning of the general conduct of the institution or a particular issue raises broader questions. In the current Commission, there are forty Directorates-General (DGs) divided into four groups: policies, external relations, general services and internal services. The majority of the Commission employees work for the DGs. DGs in the Commission are compared to Ministers in a national government. Even though DGs’ work for Commissioners their responsibilities are to the Commission. The work inside the DG focuses on the development of programmes, administration of Community funding and bringing different public and private actors together. You can see the Cabinet as being between the College of Commissioners, representing the political part of the Commission, and the DGs representing the administrative part of the Commission. A Cabinet is composed of seven to eight officials and is appointed by the President. Each Cabinet is the office of a Commissioner and is a line between Commissioners and DGs allowing cooperation between them and helping Commissioner with formulating priorities and policies. They keep Commissioners informed of other happenings in the Commission and help prepare weekly meetings for the College of Commissioners in combination with other Cabinets The powers of the Commission can be broadly explained and interpreted, but the main points can be narrowed down to four specific points: legislative powers, agenda and budget planning, executive powers and supervisory powers. Legislative power as to making sure that the rules in Treaties are being complied with and determining how EU nationals may stay in other States after they have worked there. The Commission is also responsible the budget planning for each year and the making of the agenda. The Commission has executive powers responsible for collecting the revenue for the EU, coordinating the spending of the EU and administering the EU aid to third countries. The Commission has supervisory powers to monitor the compliance of the Member States to the rules of the Union. Does the Commission have â€Å"a vocation to further the interest of the Community as a whole? † I believe it does, by looking at its responsibilities in the Union itself proves this. And if you look at the statement made by the Court of Justice where it says that â€Å"Commissioners are required to ensure that the general interest of the European Union precedes at all times over national and personal interest†. In which I understand that a Commissions’ work should be emphasized on the whole Community (EU) instead of just one State Member. How to cite Commission in the European Union, Essay examples

Costing and Pricing Of Transport Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Costing and Pricing Of Transport. Answer: Introduction The report is intended to compare and contrast the different pricing arrangement of Celero, which has been considered as an independent logistics group based in Mauritius. The different types of the comparisons have been further seen to recommend for peak in demand for its services and how these can be implemented along with the control demand. Discussion Transport demand is identified as the capacity of the transport infrastructure and the modes for geographically defined transport system. This has been determined with fully or partially expressed values in terms of the number of people. Transport supply is considered as the geographically defined mode of the transportation services which are based on certain time period. In addition to this, the supply has been determined with the infrastructures capacity and frequency of the services. Capacity has been further assessed as per the static and dynamic means which is able to represent the space amount available for transport (Kolisch, Brunner and Larsen 2016). The common goal for fulfilling of the derived transport demand has been seen to be based on the various types of the consideration which has been seen to be related to support for mobility. The demand for the services can be further related to provide transport supply. In addition to this the interdependency factor can be considered as the main concept for supply and demand. The different types of pricing arrangements of transport in an operation need to be considered as per the cost of services and value of service. The cost of service pricing has been seen to be based on the established transport cost which varies with the cost of service as per the distance and volume approach. The value of the service pricing has been further based on the demand of transportation and the competitive situation (Hitt, Xu and Carnes 2016). In terms of the shipping cost the different types of the transportation pricing has been further based on the various type of the pricing consideration has been discerned with Free on Board pricing, factory gate pricing, delivered pricing zone pricing, quantity discounts, allowances and pricing and negotiations (Slack, Chambers and Johnston 2013). With particular consideration for Celero it has been observed that the shippers are seen to be focusing more than fewer carriers and greater emphasis on the different types of the negotiated prices. The main form of the negotiation process has been seen to be evident with the development of the mutually benefitting agreements and the same has been recognised with the performance motivation variances. The most significant form of the negotiation peeress has been further able to state on the various tryout the factors which been related to the carriers and shippers working towards a common goal to reduce the base cost of the carriers (Harvey, Heineke and Lewis 2016). Conclusion The main depiction has been able to state that the demand for the transportation has been related to the consumptive and the productive transport needs. The pricing arrangement has been further related to the Cost-of-service pricing and Value-of-Service Pricing. References Harvey, J., Heineke, J. and Lewis, M. (2016) Editorial for Journal of Operations Management special issue on professional Service Operations Management (PSOM), Journal of Operations Management, pp. 48. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2016.03.005. Hitt, M. A., Xu, K. and Carnes, C. M. (2016) Resource based theory in operations management research, Journal of Operations Management, 41, pp. 7794. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.002. Kolisch, R., Brunner, J. O. and Larsen, J. (2016) Airport operations management, Computers and Operations Research, p. 163. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2015.09.001. Slack, N., Chambers, S. and Johnston, R. (2013) Operations Management, Operations Management. doi: 9780132342711.